Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in

Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>

Mail folder: html-archive
Next message: Peter Flynn: "Re: <pre>"
Previous message: Peter Flynn: "Re: OOPS! META got promoted; why did nbsp go away?"
Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Sink: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in"
Reply: Murray Maloney: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in"

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 17:53:43 EDT
Message-id: <199410072146.WAA06503@curia.ucc.ie>
Reply-To: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

Dan writes:

> I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but...
> 
> Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
> ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.

This means &nbsp: would be disallowed. It's in ISOpub I think.
This also means &lt; and &gt; would have to go, as well as &amp;

I think we should keep them in.

///Peter