Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Flooding the mailing list"
• Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "
• Reply: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 18:22:12 EDT
Message-id: <9410072220.AA01314@ulua.hal.com>
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

In message <9410072149.AA28044@hook.spyglass.com>, Eric W. Sink writes:
>
>>Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
>>ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.
>
>Which I believe refers to the "Additional Entity Sets (Proposed)" section
>at the botton of entities.html,
>
>right?

Right.

I guess you can stick it in there as proposed, as long as you make the
propsed pages neon orange. Every time I stuck a "proposed" thingy in
the spec, the readers didn't get the distinction.

Dan