Appropriate uses of the Final HTML 2.0 Document
"Eric W. Sink" <eric@oclc.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 94 08:45:10 EDT
Message-id: <9406201244.AA00834@hook.spyglass.com>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: "Eric W. Sink" <eric@oclc.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Appropriate uses of the Final HTML 2.0 Document
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group
After we "finalize" the HTML 2.0 spec documents, I would like to produce an
annotated version for Mosaic. This would simply be a specification
document which includes annotations about the spec as it applies to our
software. Such information would be inappropriate for inclusion in the
spec, but would be useful for us. For example, in the section on IMG
elements, we may want to mention the specific list of formats which are
supported.
I speculate that other vendors might find the same strategy to be useful.
Does this seem like an appropriate use of the document, once it is complete?
--
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer -- eric@spyglass.com 217-355-6000 ext 237
All opinions expressed are mine, and may not be those of my employer.
"Only academic people put cheese in their pocket."
-SW, 24 May 1994