Re: Standards Track or Informational?
weibel@oclc.org
Wed, 16 Nov 94 15:00:57 EST
> Given that we expect HTML 2.1 to follow on soon after 2.0, do we want
> HTML 2.0 to be the standards-track RFC, or just an informational RFC?
>
> I think we should do HTML 2.0 as an informational RFC. Mostly, it says
> to information providers "here's what's in the hands of end-users
> today."
Dan's suggestion makes a lot of sense to me. I'd like to hear from some of
the old hands at IETF matters, though... Larry? Tim?
stu