Re: Language Markup
Terry Allen (terry@ora.com)
Fri, 28 Jul 95 23:29:43 EDT
A further note: en-cockney is still a NAME, so the restriction to
NAME would be appropriate either way we choose to go; but I fear
that if people get the idea they can make up their own extensions,
we'll see en.real!cool! which would have to be CDATA. Then
browsers developers would feel required to treat a LANG att as
CDATA anyway.
Regards,
--
Terry Allen (terry@ora.com) O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Editor, Digital Media Group 101 Morris St.
Sebastopol, Calif., 95472
A Davenport Group sponsor. For information on the Davenport
Group see ftp://ftp.ora.com/pub/davenport/README.html
or http://www.ora.com/davenport/README.html