Re: DNS & WWW

mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
Message-id: <9304141903.AA00704@fionn.lbl.gov>
From: mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1993 12:03:45 PDT
In-Reply-To: dcmartin@ckm.ucsf.edu (David C. Martin)
       "DNS & WWW" (Apr 14, 10:50am)
Reply-To: mike@fionn.lbl.gov
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.3 5/22/91)
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: DNS & WWW
On Apr 14, 10:50am, David C. Martin wrote:
> MX records are probably closest to what you want, since they allow for
> multiple machines to be specified as mail exchange hosts with weighting
> for the preferred and non-preferred hosts.

Perhaps someone should begin thinking about this & working
with the people who work on the DNS standards.  I'm not
sure WKS is used for much of anything & whether every implementation
can deal with it -- it never caut on.  Maybe a new kind of
record is needed, analogous to MX records, an IX record for
information exchangers?