Re: Registrar
Dirk Herr-Hoyman <hoymand@joe.uwex.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 09:27:06 -0500
From: Dirk Herr-Hoyman <hoymand@joe.uwex.edu>
Message-id: <9307141427.AA06921@joe.uwex.edu>
To: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Registrar
Cc: raisch@ora.com, timbl@nxoc01.cern.ch, ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu,
terry@ora.com, www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Status: RO
Rob writes:
>URNs do not refer to living documents. URNs refer to static products.
>Just as the URN is forever, the product to which it refers is forever, and
>if there is some reason to change it, that change creates a new product.
>If the product is for some reason no longer available, then the URN maps
>to zero URLs.
If URNs do not refer to living documents, than what does? I can't see
creating two mechanisms, one for static information and one for dynamic. URLs
are already used in WWW, which is certainly a vehicle for dynamic documents
(such as the demonstration annotation server). If URNs are to be useful, then
they must be THE Universal mechanism for all resources.
---
Dirk Herr-Hoyman |
Internet Publishing Specialist | Practice
Electronic Journal of Extension | random acts of kindness
Project Coordinator | and
University of Wisconsin-Extension | senseless beauty
hoymand@joe.uwex.edu (NeXTmail accepted) |
608-265-3893 (voice) 608-265-2530 (fax) |