Re: Registrar
X-Ns-Transport-Id: 08003700A369E6863007
Date: 	Thu, 15 Jul 1993 02:54:57 PDT
Subject: Re: Registrar
In-Reply-To: "uri-request%mocha.bunyip:com:Xerox's message of 14 Jul 93 21:08:41 +0100 (Wednesday)"
Message-id: <"15-Jul-93 10:54:57 +1".*>
Status: RO

Rob et al,
whilst the scheme you outline (concatentating a mutable name with a version
number) works in select cases, I can think of situations where it doesnt work
so well.

If for example the URN is derived from a high precision digital signature
algorithm then that URN has no mutable info at all.

   -- Jock Williams --