Re: HTML+ Comments

Bill Janssen <>
Message-id: <>
Date: 	Mon, 19 Jul 1993 15:49:44 PDT
Sender: Bill Janssen <>
From: Bill Janssen <>
Subject: Re: HTML+ Comments
In-reply-to: <>
References: <>
Status: RO
Excerpts from ext.WorldWideWeb: 19-Jul-93 Re: HTML+ Comments (2789)

> Fine, but what happened with HTML-0 compatibility?  You leave <IMG> in
> for compatibility, but drop <I> <B> <U> in spite of it.  Personally
> I'd really favor being completely backward compatible, since it
> appears that HTML-0 might have a long life of its own, especially once
> canonicalized as an informative RFC.

Yes, please.