Re: Next server release ...

Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu>
From: Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu>
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: Next server release ... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jul 1993 14:20:17 +1200."
             <199307210220.AA04457@kauri.vuw.ac.nz> 
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1993 09:24:11 -0500
Message-id: <28850.743264651@moose.cs.indiana.edu>
Sender: mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu
Status: RO
Thus wrote: Nathan Torkington
>How about a decompression system ... when stat() fails on ``file'',
>look for ``file.gz'' and ``file.z'' and ``file.Z'' and ``file.f'',
>etc, and decompress as needed.  That way once I have an area static, I
>can gzip the lot and save on diskspace (no, whatever makes you think
>that I'm referring to the thesaurus and CIA world-fact-book? :-).
>
>If the client says they know about x-gzip or whatever the MIME
>incantation is for ``I've got decompression nous'', then the
>decompression doesn't have to be performed.  Sound reasonable?  If you
>think so, write your name and your idea of this week's mystery guest
>on the back of an envelope and send to ....  No wait, if you like the
>idea, implement it and send it to CERN.

Last I heard, how precisely to incorporate compression into MIME
wasn't well defined (hence all the x-types.)  Dunno how soon that'll
change.

It seems likely to me that you'll want to wait on using such a feature
much until the majority of users can receive compressed files directly
(i.e. xmosaic goes HTTP/1.0) unless your server has little disk space
and tons of free CPU.

- Marc
--
Marc VanHeyningen  mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu  MIME, RIPEM & HTTP spoken here