Re: docs vs browsers

marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 93 19:10:57 -0500
From: marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen)
Message-id: <9308030010.AA14865@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
To: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch (www-talk)
Subject: Re: docs vs browsers
In-reply-to: <sgLOfrwB0KGWMLUXcu@holmes.parc.xerox.com>
References: <9308022243.AA01853@Xtreme>
	<sgLOfrwB0KGWMLUXcu@holmes.parc.xerox.com>
X-Md4-Signature: 008db6e0f4a981ee29557051177c193a
Status: RO
Bill Janssen writes:
> I completely agree.  The point is that there are many many formats which
> do provide this capability.  Simply use one of them (MS-Word,
> Postscript, FrameMaker MIF, TeX, troff, etc.), instead of trying to use
> a format which does not provide this  kind of thing.  The other point is
> that while almost all current markup formats are gunked up with
> procedural formatting, HTML isn't (too much).  It would be nice if there
> was *one* format which didn't have these procedural formatting warts.

......and that nobody used?

Marc