Re: coupla html+ possibilities (Marc Andreessen)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 93 13:06:38 -0500
From: (Marc Andreessen)
Message-id: <>
To: "Peter Lister, Cranfield Computer Centre" <>
Subject: Re: coupla html+ possibilities
In-reply-to: <9307051626.AA05940@xdm039>
References: <9307051546.AA22621@xdm001>
X-Md4-Signature: 393ef6fd826eb836e0f4d0bc4c95c79b
Status: RO
"Peter Lister, Cranfield Computer Centre" writes:
> > If these are going to be universal bitmaps, then you
> > need to provide a specification so that people can
> > make equivalents for them on other browsers/platforms;
> > perhaps you need a universal bitmap format so we can
> > have the same appearance on diff platforms, and maybe you
> > need to define the intended semantics of the icons.
> But please God, nobody invent another "universal" bitmap format.
> There are enough already. As far as I'm aware, that's the idea - a
> name which implies the meaning, i.e. "home-icon" would draw a
> standard picture of a little house, or "HOME" on a dumb terminal.


It certainly may be that this is a bad idea, that each information
provider should provide his/her own set of bitmaps which are served
normally over the network as is done now, etc.  I just think it would
be nice if there were a fairly consistent "palette" of icons that
could be used liberally and would stand a good chance of being
represented in non-graphics displays as well... I think the user
interface of the overall system would benefit.