content-type => media-type ?
Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: content-type => media-type ?
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Fake-Sender: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Message-id: <93Dec30.231604pst.2732@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1993 23:15:52 PST
Content-Length: 446
I've noticed in recent RFCs, it's been explained that `content-type'
as used in MIME is being extended to a broader notion of `media-type'.
MIME can go ahead and use 'content-type', since, in the case of MIME,
it is the type of the content of the message, but for WWW applicatons,
resource-type or some other designation is probably more appropriate.
Just a minor shift in nomenclature. You may now go back to you
regularly scheduled program.