Re: Protocol Benchmarking (with Accept examples - long)

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Dave_Raggett: "Re: Protocol Benchmarking (HTTP protocol)"
• Previous message: David Koblas: "MIME Transfer Format (is Re: Protocol Benchmarking...)"
• In-reply-to: Larry Masinter: "Re: Protocol Benchmarking (with Accept examples - long)"
• Reply: Alexsander Totic: "Re: Protocol Benchmarking (with Accept examples - long)"

From: luotonen@ptsun00.cern.ch (Ari Luotonen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 11:10:20 +0100
Message-id: <9402031010.AA01724@ptsun03.cern.ch>
To: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: Protocol Benchmarking (with Accept examples - long)
Cc: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Content-Length: 409

> While we're optimizing things, how about looking at the exchanges
> necessary for an authenticated call. Right now, access control adds a
> lot of exchanges.

In a long run it doesn't add much -- first time you have one
extra connection "wasted", but from then on, if the documents
are organized in a sensible way, everything goes so smoothly
you don't notice anything extra happening.

-- Cheers, Ari --