Re: proposals for log file format changes

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Henning G. Schulzrinne: "Re: proposals for log file format changes"
• Previous message: Rik Harris: "Re: proposals for log file format changes "
• In-reply-to: Rik Harris: "Re: proposals for log file format changes "
• Reply: Tony Sanders: "Re: proposals for log file format changes "

Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 12:08:16 --100
Message-id: <199402081105.GAA14196@totalrecall.rs.itd.umich.edu>
Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: michael shiplett <michael.shiplett@umich.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: proposals for log file format changes 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 407

"kh" = Kevin 'Kev' Hughes <kevinh@eit.COM> writes:

kh>	So now the format would be

kh> host rfc931 authuser [DD/Mon/YYYY:hh:mm:ss TTT] ``request'' ddd bbbb

kh>	...where TTT is the local timezone?

  I hope TTT is the offset from UTC, e.g. -0400, and not a
three-letter abbreviation for the timezone name, e.g. EST. Timezone
abbreviations do not transfer well from country to country (if at
all).

michael