Re: complaint about CGI

luotonen@ptsun00.cern.ch (Ari Luotonen)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
Next message: Rob McCool: "Re: complaint about CGI"
Previous message: Rob McCool: "complaint about CGI"
Maybe in reply to: Rob McCool: "complaint about CGI"
Reply: Rob McCool: "Re: complaint about CGI"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 11:41:01 --100
Message-id: <9402201912.AA27911@ptsun03.cern.ch>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: luotonen@ptsun00.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: luotonen@ptsun00.cern.ch (Ari Luotonen)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: complaint about CGI
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 516


> The question is, what do we do about it? Many people want me to ``fix''
> httpd so that it sends any unknown headers back to the client. This isn't so
> bad, and would be backward compatible, but I don't want people to depend on
> it without formally changing the spec

I'm all for it.


> (John, Ari, what did you guys do?).

Originally I sent back all the headers, but took that off since the
spec marked this as illegal.


BTW, Rob: Content-Encoding should be Content-Transfer-Encoding :-(

-- Cheers, Ari --