Re: WWW "versus" gopher

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Chu-Peng Cheong: "HELP - Need to startup a HTTP daemon."
• Previous message: Markus Stumpf: "Multipart Messages in HTTP"
• Maybe in reply to: Lou Montulli: "Re: WWW "versus" gopher"
• Reply: Paul "S." Wain: "Re: WWW "versus" gopher"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1994 03:10:34 --100
Message-id: <whTx8LMB0KGWA2acxR@holmes.parc.xerox.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: janssen@parc.xerox.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.xerox.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: WWW "versus" gopher
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 268

Gosh, this doesn't seem so surprising, as "www" includes all of gopher,
http, ftp, etc.  What would be more interesting would be if, say, http
use surpassed gopher.  But looking at your message (port 80), it would
seem that this is really what you meant to say.

Bill