Re: file://localhost => local: ?

altis@ibeam.jf.intel.com (Kevin Altis)
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 20:06:43 --100
Message-id: <m0pipCr-00043NC@ibeam.intel.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: altis@ibeam.jf.intel.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: altis@ibeam.jf.intel.com (Kevin Altis)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: file://localhost  =>  local: ?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Length: 884
At  7:14 PM 3/21/94 +0000, Larry Masinter wrote:
>Another more serious problem is that many HTML documents on the net
>still use 'file:' instead of 'ftp:'. To get this to work with the
>proxy gateway, I set things up so that
>
>setenv file_proxy = http://myserver:/
>
>and then set up the httpd.conf on the server so that:
>        Pass    file:*  ftp:*

Regardless of the URL confusion, you shouldn't have had to change X Mosaic
or the cern_httpd. URLs of the form file://host.domain/ are interpreted by
Cello, Lynx, Mosaic, etc. as ftp URLs, so the proxying still works
correctly. URLs of the form file://localhost/ are considered local
filesystem references.

Yes, use of file: rather than ftp: is rather confusing. It is the job of
the URI working group to document correct URL usage, but it will be
sometime before people can be persuaded not to use file: instead of ftp:.

ka