Re: html+ - remove <p> and </p>

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
• Next message: Becky Burnard: "Re: html+ - remove <p> and </p>"
• Previous message: sg04%kesser@gte.com: "We are experiencing momentary technical difficultes, please stand by..."
• Reply: Becky Burnard: "Re: html+ - remove <p> and </p>"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 1994 19:47:27 --100
Message-id: <9404011739.AA01506@pissarro.wustl.edu>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: sam@pissarro.wustl.edu
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Samudra Sengupta <sam@pissarro.wustl.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: html+ - remove <p> and </p>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 424

> I agree!  I have also been frustrated with not having the option of a hard
> return without the blank line that the <p> flag adds.  Any solution for
> that that I have missed?

I sometimes use the <PRE> ... </PRE> tag manually for
sections in my documents to preserve hard returns and
not bother with <p>'s.  I don't know if it is a good
solution, but hey, it's a solution.

cheers,
sam

--
http://schiller.wustl.edu/~sam