Re: FW: Re: HTTP problem or Mosaic problem?

Paul Everitt <paul@cminds.com>

Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
Next message: William C. Fenner: "Re: HTTP problem or Mosaic problem? "
Previous message: Ken Fox: "Re: Concerns about HTML+ complexity"
Maybe in reply to: Bob Denny: "FW: Re: HTTP problem or Mosaic problem? "

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 19:57:50 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <Pine.3.89.9406161345.C1243-0100000@gator.cminds.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: paul@cminds.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Paul Everitt <paul@cminds.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: FW: Re: HTTP problem or Mosaic problem? 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0


I liked Bob`s angle.  Is this a correct summary:

	"Don't manage the state with the httpd, manage it with
	 the cgi-bin app."

However, I want to see if I understand his proposal: will subsequent 
messages to the cgi-bin "object" go through the httpd?  This would allow 
a good deal of piggy-backing on the HTTP work, primarily in security.

What ever happened to the talk of binding the HTTP stuff to the OMG stuff?

--Paul

Paul Everitt             V 703.785.7384  Email Paul.Everitt@cminds.com
Connecting Minds, Inc.   F 703.785.7385  WWW   http://www.cminds.com/