Re: RTF vs. PDF [Was Re: hyperRTF?]

Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 05:44:04 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <17148.772429287@moose.cs.indiana.edu>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: RTF vs. PDF [Was Re: hyperRTF?] 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Thus wrote: Paul Everitt
>In reply to the "Why not talk about Acrobat PDF instead of RTF" over 
>HTTP, I'd like to know, what are the file sizes to "distill" equivalent 
>documents for PDF vs. RTF.  

More importantly, what is the cost of software to "distill" equivalent
documents for PDF vs. RTF?

  lots happer since I programmed my mail hooks to delete NON-DELIVERY
  messages,
- Marc
--
<A HREF="http://www.cs.indiana.edu/hyplan/mvanheyn.html">Marc VanHeyningen</A>