Re: meta information

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
• Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: meta information "
• Previous message: Martijn Koster: "Re: meta information "
• Maybe in reply to: Martijn Koster: "Re: meta information "
• Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: meta information "

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 1994 22:58:47 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9406012056.AA16784@ulua.hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: meta information 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0

In message <9406012051.AA10575@hal.com>, Martijn Koster writes:
>
>> If you get to the point where you expect other
>> folks to understand the meaning of these idioms, just propose
>> new tags:
>> 	<KEYWORDS>a,b,c,</keywords>
>> 	<description>lkjsdlfkjsldf... </description>
>
>Well, if you do that and your browser doesn't understand these tags
>the text in between ends up in your document, which is not where
>you want it.

So you're saying current browsers are broken. So what's new?
We can decide (a) we need to fix them, or (b) we can never
have non-empty elements in the HEAD.

I was working under assumption (a). If you choose (b), you
can still write:

	<KEYWORDS words="a,b,c">
	<description text="alsdkfjlkj sldfkj sldf">

Dan