Re: Bug in HTTP protocol documentation?

David Kearns (david@gdol.com)
Fri, 9 Sep 1994 15:20:18 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jay C. Weber: "Re: Lotus Notes -- Too much Hype !!!"
Previous message: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Authentication across multiple proxied servers"
Maybe in reply to: W. Scott Meeks: "Bug in HTTP protocol documentation?"
Next in thread: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Bug in HTTP protocol documentation?"

At 11:14 PM 9/8/94 +0200, W. Scott Meeks wrote:
>I'm looking at
>http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/Protocols/HTTP/Request.html "HTTP: The
>Request" under "HTTP: A protocol for networked information".
>
>In the line:
>
> FullRequest = Method UR ProtocolVersion CrLf
> ^^
>
>UR really looks like it should be <uri> or possibly URI.

Do you mean URL? the only URI that I know of is Upper Respretory Infection...
(Of course I could easily be ignorant, I'm good at that...)

-- 
 David Kearns           email:david@gdol.com         
 GolfData On-Line       voice:(800)778-GDOL          
 4639 North 20th Place        (703)525-3688          
 Arlington, VA  22207   fax:  (703)525-3775          
 USA                    web:  http://www.gdol.com

Next message: Jay C. Weber: "Re: Lotus Notes -- Too much Hype !!!"
Previous message: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Authentication across multiple proxied servers"
Maybe in reply to: W. Scott Meeks: "Bug in HTTP protocol documentation?"
Next in thread: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Bug in HTTP protocol documentation?"