Knowledge Election Phase 3
Development of an Expert Knowledge Base for the Control of an Intelligent Robot Sumo Wrestler
Situation Assessment Module
Course Project for CPSC 679 -- Cognitive Processes in Artificial Intelligence
All the elements elicited by the experts are combined and discussed. This set is then reduced or increased and changed in any other way come up with a set of elements to fully span the domain being discussed. A second grid is elicited from the experts using the common set of elements while eliciting constructs from each expert. The comparison of the following grids will give allow for the test of Correspondence (the use of different terminology to express the same idea) and Contrast (the use of different terminology to express different ideas).
The Resultant Grids Using a Common Set of Elements to Elicit Constructs from each Expert
The following are links to the repertory grids elicited from the experts using a common set of elements. All experts were involved. The elements used were:
- Establishment of the Line of Engagement
- Possible Entry Points
- Own Exposure
- Target Exposure
- Lead Time
- Effective Range of Each Weapon
- Weapons' State of Readiness
- Usage of Leverage
- Available Leverage
Here are the grids:
Anthony
Don
Rob
Vlad
Levels of Inter-Expert Correspondence and Contrast
Construct Correspondence and Contrast Results
Return to Elicitation Process Page
Let me know what you think: email vlad@combdyn.com