Re: HTML 3.0 standardization

Dave Raggett <>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 12:20:20 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: Dave Raggett <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: HTML 3.0 standardization
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
Eric writes:

> It was my understanding that Dave's work was to be the
> 'basis for discussion' of a 3.0 spec.  When I see mentions of
> testbed browsers and signed book agreements with A-W, I have the
> sense that I missed something.

Nothing has changed there. A-W merely want a textbook for the
final version as decided by this group. It takes a lot of time
to write such books, hence the forward planning. I am sorry if
I have caused any confusion.

The testbed browser is critical to testing ideas before they
can be placed into the spec. I am open to suggestions for which
ideas should be tested in this way, and you will all get to play
with the browser *before* we decide on just what HTML 3.0 is to be.

> I think it's important that HTML 3.0 go through a regular group
> discussion period before steps are taken which would turn it into
> any kind of standard.  Even the wide availability of a testbed
> browser makes me a little nervous.  I, like Murray, am eager to
> see the browser in action, but I am also eager to limit its
> exposure until it implements a language that the rest of us are
> comfortable with.

I was thinking of calling it an HTML+ browser that allows us to
test out proposed extensions to HTML before we commit ourselves.
It seems important to solicit widespread input on potential new
features. A consensus draft spec for Spring '95 gives us several
months for the group discussion.

How would you like to position such as demonstration?
Best wishes,

Dave Raggett

Hewlett Packard Laboratories              email:
Filton Road                               tel:   +44 272 228046
Stoke Gifford                             fax:   +44 272 228003
Bristol BS12 6QZ
United Kingdom