Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in "Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 18:22:12 EDT
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
In message <9410072149.AA28044@hook.spyglass.com>, Eric W. Sink writes:
>>Please don't put any proposals that involve characters outside of
>>ISO Latin 1 into the 2.0 spec.
>Which I believe refers to the "Additional Entity Sets (Proposed)" section
>at the botton of entities.html,
I guess you can stick it in there as proposed, as long as you make the
propsed pages neon orange. Every time I stuck a "proposed" thingy in
the spec, the readers didn't get the distinction.