Re: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML email@example.com (Yuri Rubinsky)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 18:40:03 EDT
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Yuri Rubinsky)
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
> Despite all the reasonable arguments for putting it in, I do not
perceive that the consensus of this group is to address the ICADD
issues for HTML 2.0. I *do* perceive a desire to do an HTML 2.1,
where this and other things we've deferred may be addressed.
My sense was that there was a desire to incorporate the fixed SDA attributes
that allow HTML files to be then transformed for the visually impaired --
which is the relateively straightforward job that Jeff Suttor and I
volunteered for and which gets done the minute the DTD is completely
stable -- but *not* to incorporate the "other-way-round" issues, which
were the more complicated subject of so many discussions.
That stuff will wait till 2.1.
Dan and I discussed this at dinner at Seybold (with Jeff, the volunteer
in question, among others) and I think he agreed with me that that seemed
to be the consensus.