Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML email@example.com (Eric W. Sink)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 16:23:22 EDT
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
Despite all the reasonable arguments for putting it in, I do not
perceive that the consensus of this group is to address the ICADD
issues for HTML 2.0. I *do* perceive a desire to do an HTML 2.1,
where this and other things we've deferred may be addressed.
This message is just to give specific expression to what I think
is already the consensus of this group. If I am wrong, please let
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer -- firstname.lastname@example.org 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass. They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
"Never put your tongue on a glacier."