Re: DL content model

Tom Magliery (
Mon, 14 Nov 94 14:49:18 EST

>> * change to DL content model from (DT*, DD?)+ to (DT | DD)*.
>> OK, I guess.
>This doesn't match what was discussed at the Working group meeting
>in Chicago. I thought we had agreed on:
> <!ELEMENT DL - - (DT*, DD)+>

This is confirmed by Stu's minutes:

>Discussion of List content model raised by Murray: p 63/31
> Required: (DT+, DD)*
> Deprecated: (DT|DD)*

Can someone remind me why we didn't just settle on the (DT|DD)*? I can't
remember any reason...


Tom Magliery ** NCSA ** 605 E Springfield ** Champaign IL 61820 ** USA