Re: DL content model

Peter Flynn (
Wed, 16 Nov 94 04:16:01 EST

Bert wrote:
> I haven't seen (DT+|DD+)* yet, wouldn't that express everything people
> asked for: one or more terms with one or more definitions?

One would have thought so, but the reality is that DL has been used for
other purposes, so if we are trying to make the DTD reflect practice as
well as intent, we need to handle cases where there are zero or more DTs
and DDs.

I know of many files where DD has been used on its own to make some text