Re: Various HTML questions

"Rob Raisch, The Internet Company" <raisch@internet.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 17:59:51 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <Pine.3.85.9405030839.A28108-0100000@hmmm>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: raisch@internet.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: "Rob Raisch, The Internet Company" <raisch@internet.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Various HTML questions
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Tue, 3 May 1994 lilley@v5.cgu.mcc.ac.uk wrote:

> connolly@hal.com says:
> 
> > Where does it say this in the spec? I don't think any HTML spec says
> >_exactly_ how HTML is to be rendered. 
> 
> Depends on how much emphasis you want to put on the exactly. True you will not 
> find "render this heading in Palatino demiblog 14.7 point with 3 point leading 
> and +4.7% kerning"

Well, if we supported style-sheets in documents, we could come close. (See:
http://gummo.stanford.edu/html/hypermail/.www-talk-1993q2.messages/443.html)

I'm pretty convinced that we will not be able to provide anything the 
publisher really can use until we can offer them control over presentation.

Every publisher I have dog and ponied Mosaic to has loved it ... until I 
resize the window or change the font -- at which point they run screaming 
and shouting out the door, never to be seen again. (Well, not quite that 
bad, but you get the idea.)

</rr>