------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BDDB8B.64D723C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello
i've had an idea just after posting the last message. I've read that =
there is not "to be" verb in Mandarin; therefore, the fallacy of =
reification is less likely to happen; and then, maybe, it's easier to =
overcome the limits of language.
Sounds implausible, i know! but then again, it seems inviting!
any comments?
Esteban Laso
eslaso@ibm.net
You can respond to this e-mail online.
If you have ICQ my ICQ# is 10231215
If you don't have ICQ you can send me e-mail to =
10231215@pager.mirabilis.com
You can download ICQ at http://www.icq.com/
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BDDB8B.64D723C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">