Re: CONCEPTS/CONSTRUCTS

Michael Donovan (donovanmj@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 08:22:12 -0800

--------------FB0346D7C1B9069517ADAD92
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Please let me know the reference to whick you refer in your message.
Thanks. Mike

DARAGHnJAN@aol.com wrote:

> Just to say I agree with Jim Mancuso's comment on concepts - it's just that
> I'm surrounded by business academics who think a concept is something nice and
> clean and 'rational' (whatever that means) - something divorced from the
> process of cognition - or, if it has something to do with cognition, then it
> is certainly not *personal* in any way. That would undermine the 'objectivity'
> of the discourse ...
>
> Daragh O'Reilly
> Lecturer in Marketing
> Bradford Management Centre

--------------FB0346D7C1B9069517ADAD92
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Please let me know the reference to whick you refer in your message.
Thanks.    Mike

DARAGHnJAN@aol.com wrote:

Just to say I agree with Jim Mancuso's comment on concepts - it's just that
I'm surrounded by business academics who think a concept is something nice and
clean and 'rational'  (whatever that means) - something divorced from the
process of cognition - or, if it has something to do with cognition, then it
is certainly not *personal* in any way. That would undermine the 'objectivity'
of the discourse ...

Daragh O'Reilly
Lecturer in Marketing
Bradford Management Centre

--------------FB0346D7C1B9069517ADAD92--

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%