Re: IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ]

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Murray Maloney: "Re: Digest of Tim's mail"
• Previous message: Bill Hefley: "Re: IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ] "
• In-reply-to: Daniel W. Connolly: "IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ]"

Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 14:01:43 EDT
Message-id: <9407051757.AA00512@homer.spry.com>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: wmperry@oclc.org
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group (Private)

Daniel W. Connolly writes:
>In message <9407051525.AA04336@www3.cern.ch>, Tim Berners-Lee writes:
>
>>Date: 30 June 1994
>>
[...]
>>
>>What do you think?  The mechsnisms of archived dicsussion
>>are all there -- the group mailing list could be specified
>>as www-html, and this list could be kept an editor's list,
>>or the html-ig list could be opened as the working group list.

>I vote for www-html, based on quality of service. The newbie factor
>isn't too bad on that list either.

  I second for the use of www-html.

>>  We would establish a set of milestones and a strict charter

>Blech. Oh well... whatever it takes to get all this mess overwith.

>>Who would be able to come to meetings at the next IETF in Toronto
>>July 25-29? 

>Dunno. I wasn't planning on it, but I'd like to be there, especially
>if the rest of "the players" will be there.

   Chris Wilson and I will be trying to attend.  Are there any
registration fees, or other administrivia like that?  Will attendance
of the entire 5 day conference be necessary, or is there a smaller
time frame for the HTML-only discussions?  I'm not sure if I could talk
the president of SPRY into doing without both his web-people for a full
week.

-Bill P.