Re: Paul Burchard on HTML 2.0 FORMs

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Peter Flynn: "Re: HTML and IETF"
• Previous message: Murray Maloney: "Re: HTML BOF is Tuesday"
• In-reply-to: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Paul Burchard on HTML 2.0 FORMs "

Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 18:55:45 EDT
Message-id: <94Jul12.155430pdt.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@oclc.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Paul Burchard on HTML 2.0 FORMs 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group (Private)

I guess I'm arguing that 'AUDIO' and 'SCRIBBLE' are not only not
already 'out there', but they are design elements that we'll probably
want to change, and thus shouldn't even be in the 'proposed' section
of HTML 2.0.

I'll forward the rest of the discussion about the possible of those
concepts to www-talk.