Re: Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for Review ]

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Corprew Reed: "Information (New Subscriber)"
• Previous message: Murray Maloney: "Re: Anchor name syntax: CDATA"
• In-reply-to: Murray Maloney: "Re: Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for Review ]"

Message-id: <199406102215.WAA03693@hnear>
X-Authentication-Warning: hnear: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Authentication-Warning: hnear: jay owned process doing -bs
To: html-ig@oclc.org
Subject: Re: Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for Review ] 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Jun 1994 18:00:31 EDT."
             <9406101752.aa15757@dali.scocan.sco.COM> 
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 15:15:09 -0700
From: Jay Glicksman <jay@eit.COM>
Content-Length: 316

>  <CITE>some quoted text <EM>emphasized text</EM></CITE>

This will be difficult to handle with style sheets (given all the
permutations of style within style [within style...]) but nonetheless
I think it should be legal HTML, and optional for browsers to support
the style change of the nested markup.

    Jay G.