Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: weibel@oclc.org: "Re: Presentation at Conference"
• Previous message: Yuri Rubinsky: "Presentation at Conference"
• Maybe in reply to: Eduardo Gutentag: "Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]"
• Reply: Murray Maloney: "Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]"

Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 13:02:55 EDT
Message-id: <199409071701.KAA29137@rock>
Reply-To: terry@ora.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Terry Allen <terry@ora.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

> Dan's well thought out 3-dtd
solution was meant to address the issue of compliance at various
levels, and merging everything into one large dtd does not seem to
address this issue. 

It doesn't change the issue, it only puts everything in one place.
There will still be three levels, but you'll have to set them by
editing the INCLUDE/IGNORE keywords at two points within the DTD.
(That could be parameterized, I suppose, but not at much gain.)
I'm working on a 1-DTD version, and hope I can have it ready
by tomorrow.

Regards,

-- 
Terry Allen  (terry@ora.com)   Editor, Digital Media Group
O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.    Sebastopol, Calif., 95472