<graph>

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: ICADD elements in HTML "
• Previous message: Terry Allen: "ICADD elements in HTML"
• Reply: Dave Raggett: "Re: <graph>"

Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 15:56:38 EDT
Message-id: <9409081951.AA25367@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: mag@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: mag@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Tom Magliery)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: <graph>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

i have encountered, about fifth- or sixth-hand, the following query:

>} >>> However, I would **LIKE** to put on my wishlist that HTML+ include,
>} >>> along with the new tables and chemical notation features, some standard
>} >>> support for graphs. Something like:
>} >>>
>} >>> <GRAPH TYPE=XY>
>} >>> 0     0
>} >>> 1     10
>} >>> 2     40
>} >>> 3     90
>} >>> 4     160
>} >>> </GRAPH>
>} >>>
>} >>>
>} >>> ... and let the client side do the graphics.
>} >>> Does anyone know if something like that has been proposed?

this would open up a gigantic can of worms, it seems to me.  has anyone
else thought about it?

mag

Tom Magliery ** NCSA ** 605 E Springfield ** Champaign IL 61820 ** USA