Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Murray Maloney: "Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?"
• Previous message: Peter Flynn: "Re: LI attributes"
• Maybe in reply to: Glenn Randers-Pehrson ARL-WTD-TED-TIB: "STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?"
• Reply: Murray Maloney: "Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?"

Date: Wed, 21 Sep 94 05:10:23 EDT
Message-id: <199409210905.KAA25208@curia.ucc.ie>
Reply-To: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

> 	I see that the proposed specification for HTML 2 includes the
> < STRIKE >< /STRIKE > tags.  It seems to me that it would also
> be useful to have corollary tags to indicate material that has been
> added, e.g. < INSERT > < /INSERT >.  

I think we went this loop before, and the question was, how many lawyers
use HTML?

It seems to me to make sense, but is it _needed_ ?

///Peter