Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?
Murray Maloney <murray@sco.COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 94 09:10:20 EDT
Message-id: <9409210906.aa23036@dali.scocan.sco.COM>
Reply-To: murray@sco.COM
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Murray Maloney <murray@sco.COM>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)
Our customers have been asking us to produce our documentation
with change bars to indicate changes from one release to the next.
So, yes there is a need -- or at least a _want_ -- in the reader
community.
Frankly, I think that a more sophisticated method might be useful.
But perhaps that is only needed upstream from conversion ->HTML.
Murray
>
> > I see that the proposed specification for HTML 2 includes the
> > < STRIKE >< /STRIKE > tags. It seems to me that it would also
> > be useful to have corollary tags to indicate material that has been
> > added, e.g. < INSERT > < /INSERT >.
>
> I think we went this loop before, and the question was, how many lawyers
> use HTML?
>
> It seems to me to make sense, but is it _needed_ ?
>
> ///Peter