Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section"
• Previous message: Daniel LaLiberte: "Re: [Ad.Irvine@queens-belfast.ac.uk: &cx; in HTML+ ?]"
• Reply: Yuri Rubinsky: "Re: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0"

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 16:23:22 EDT
Message-id: <9410072023.AA27427@hook.spyglass.com>
Reply-To: eric@spyglass.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: eric@spyglass.com (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

Despite all the reasonable arguments for putting it in, I do not
perceive that the consensus of this group is to address the ICADD
issues for HTML 2.0.  I *do* perceive a desire to do an HTML 2.1,
where this and other things we've deferred may be addressed.

This message is just to give specific expression to what I think
is already the consensus of this group.  If I am wrong, please let
us know.


--
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer --  eric@spyglass.com 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass.  They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
                                                               :-)  :-)
    "Never put your tongue on a glacier."