Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Perceived Consensus: The overview and the DTD reference will stay"
• Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0"
• Reply: Murray Maloney: "Re: Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section"

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 16:27:04 EDT
Message-id: <9410072025.AA27439@hook.spyglass.com>
Reply-To: eric@spyglass.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: eric@spyglass.com (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

I have not seen the nearly-unanimous support that I think should be necessary
to move the META element from the proposed section to the normal sections of
the HTML 2.0 draft spec.  Unless I am rapidly convinced that I am perceiving
the consensus of the group incorrectly, it will stay as it is.


--
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer --  eric@spyglass.com 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass.  They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
                                                               :-)  :-)
    "Never put your tongue on a glacier."