OOPS! META got promoted; why did nbsp go away?

• Mail folder: html-archive
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in"
• Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section "
• Reply: Peter Flynn: "Re: OOPS! META got promoted; why did nbsp go away?"

Date: Fri, 7 Oct 94 16:42:17 EDT
Message-id: <9410072039.AA27557@hook.spyglass.com>
Reply-To: eric@spyglass.com
Originator: html-wg@oclc.org
Sender: html-wg@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: eric@spyglass.com (Eric W. Sink)
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-wg@oclc.org>
Subject: OOPS!  META got promoted; why did nbsp go away?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Working Group (Private)

I just re-read the note from Dan that mentioned he promoted META to the
normal part of the standard.  I guess you should disregard the message I
just sent about it staying in the proposed section.

Why did nbsp go away?  I may have missed the reasoning behind its removal,
but I consider it current practice, and believe that it should be part of
the standard, or at least proposed.


--
Eric W. Sink, Software Engineer --  eric@spyglass.com 217-355-6000 ext 237
I don't speak for Spyglass.  They don't even let me adjust the thermostat.
                                                               :-)  :-)
    "Never put your tongue on a glacier."