Re: New Highlighting.html [Was: whither ...? ]

Terry Allen <terry@oclc.org>

Mail folder: html-archive
Next message: Murray Maloney: "Proposal: Document use of control characters"
Previous message: Murray Maloney: "Proposal: Specify character sets by ISO number"
In-reply-to: Peter Flynn: "Re: New Highlighting.html [Was: whither ...? ]"
Reply: Terry Allen: "Re: New Highlighting.html [Was: whither ...? ]"

Date: Thu, 16 Jun 94 12:10:46 EDT
Message-id: <199406161609.JAA26824@rock>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Terry Allen <terry@oclc.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: New Highlighting.html [Was: whither <u>...</u>? ]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group

Dan, why is anything proposed for HTML+ (now 3.0) going into 
this 2.0 spec, which is supposed to reflect current practice?

Regards,

=====================================

Dan wrote:
I suppose it's reasonable to say that S is not really in use in the
context of HTML -- only in the context of HTML+ which is a separate
beast; whereas STRIKE is implemented by one popular browser, and so
it's probably in some documents out there (I haven't come across any
-- if anybody finds any, please send them to me.)

I'm willing to take S out entirely, but I'd like to hear from Dave
Raggett first.

-- 
Terry Allen  (terry@ora.com)
Editor, Digital Media Group
O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Sebastopol, Calif., 95472