Re: Seek clarification

"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@oclc.org>

Mail folder: html-archive
Next message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Seeking clarification-- NET tags "
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Proposal: Document use of control characters "

Date: Thu, 16 Jun 94 13:20:27 EDT
Message-id: <9406161718.AA02308@ulua.hal.com>
Reply-To: html-ig@oclc.org
Originator: html-ig@oclc.org
Sender: html-ig@oclc.org
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@oclc.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <html-ig@oclc.org>
Subject: Re: Seek clarification 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group

In message <9406161216.aa11362@dali.scocan.sco.COM>, Murray Maloney writes:
>In section 4.1.5:
>
>It seems that the first and second paragraphs are not related,
>except that they both discuss attributes.  Is there a heading
>missing?

HTML is really clumsy when it comes to notes/cautions/warnings, as we
all know. I used an H3 with an EMphasised paragraph for a note. But
<EM> gets lost when it's converted to text. It might have also gotten
lost in previous postscript renderings. I've fixed that locally, but
the published doc might not reflect it.

>Also, in the 2nd para, there is a typo "declared" is misspelled.
>I'm not usually so picky, but since I was commenting on this section...

I need to either learn to use ispell-buffer in emacs or switch to
FrameMaker and use the spell-checker...

Dan