Re: Reality Check for HTML 2 RFC

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: CN=Bruce Kahn/O=Iris@IRIS: "DTD Level 2 nit"
Previous message: Jay Glicksman: "Re: Reality Check for HTML 2 RFC"
Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Sink: "Reality Check for HTML 2 RFC"

weibel@oclc.org
Wed, 5 Oct 1994 14:28:44 -0400

I agree with Dan... The explanatory part of the HTML 2.0 spec
is an important part of communicating the standard.

Does it make sense to rewrite it to make it simpler to express
in plaintext? I'm willing to take a shot at it...

stu