It's the latest "released" version, but I'm doing some development to
integrate recent suggestions as we speak.
>One of the other issues (or perhaps this is also a DTD issue) is the
>FPIs for the DTDs and the use of the public text display version field
>for the (display-independent) version number. Is this change still
>planned to go into the spec?
Yes.
The changes I'm currently release-testing include:
* ICADD attributes
* FPI changes (version number, ISOlat1 clean-up)
* misuse of parameter entities
>I guess I'm wondering
>how to determine what changes are still planned, which ones are
>rejected, and which ones are unintentionally getting forgotten?
It's a little bit frustrating that we don't have a proper "defect
tracking system" or whatever.
Mail messages like this one work OK for now, though.
Expect to see a new release of the public text this week. This
afternoon, if all goes well.
Dan