Re: Restricted ports

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jul-Oct 1993
• Next message: William C Fenner: "Re: solution time for www/smtp hole "
• Previous message: Dave_Raggett: "Re: LINKs"
• In-reply-to: rhb@hotsand.att.com: "Re: Restricted ports"

Message-id: <9308131608.AA00389@herman.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: Restricted ports 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:33:20 EDT."
             <9308131433.AA03280@hotsand.dacsand> 
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 12:08:57 -0400
From: William C Fenner <fenner@herman.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Status: RO

On Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:33:20 EDT  rhb@hotsand.att.com wrote:
> ***********From Ed Vielmetti***************
> If you are going to use low numbered IP ports (e.g 81, 82, 83) for
> HTTP then you should register that usage with the Internet Assigned
> Numbers Authority (iana@venera.isi.edu).
> ********************************* 
> 
> I assume that port 80 is already assigned by this group to http.

And port 81 is already assigned to the HOSTS2 Name server, and port
82 is already assigned to the XFER Utility, and port 83 is already
assigned to the MIT ML Device, and . . .

  Bill