Re: request for new forms submission consensus

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Oct 93-present
• Next message: Marc Andreessen: "Re: request for new forms submission consensus "
• Previous message: henry strickland: "Re: request for new forms submission consensus"
• Maybe in reply to: Tony Sanders: "Re: request for new forms submission consensus "

X-Delivered: at request of secret on dxcern.cern.ch
Errors-To: sanders@bsdi.com
Message-id: <9310112021.AA28466@austin.BSDI.COM>
To: kevin@scic.intel.com (Kevin Altis)
Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: request for new forms submission consensus 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 11 Oct 93 12:33:45 -0800.
Errors-To: sanders@bsdi.com
Reply-To: sanders@bsdi.com
Organization: Berkeley Software Design, Inc.
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1993 15:21:54 -0500
From: Tony Sanders <sanders@bsdi.com>

> become available. The current MIME standard explicitly forbids use of
> encodings other than 7bit, 8bit, or binary with content types that
> recursively include other content-type fields (multipart and message); I
> think Tony's example was illegal. However, a multi-part query could be sent
My example was not illegal, it's practically identical to examples in
RFC1521.  You can't use content-transfer-encoding: on the multipart itself,
that doesn't mean the other content type's inside can't use it (in fact
they must).

--sanders