Re: Browser handling of URL's with '?' in them
Rik Harris <rik@rdt.monash.edu.au>
Message-id: <199312090623.RAA00684@daneel.rdt.monash.edu.au>
X-Authentication-Warning: daneel.rdt.monash.edu.au: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Subject: Re: Browser handling of URL's with '?' in them
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Dec 93 18:39:51 EST."
<9312082339.AA27477@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 93 17:23:15 +1100
From: Rik Harris <rik@rdt.monash.edu.au>
X-Mts: smtp
Content-Length: 1577
Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> wrote:
> Okay a number of folks of the NCSA For Macintosh browser have pointed out that
> the Macintosh browser find's the first question mark in a URL and lops off
> everything after it. As a result of which my interactive weather stuff does
> not work. I havent been able to find any definitive word on this in the specs,
> while Mosaic for X only remove's what it appends on subsequent queries (as I
> think it should). So the question is this, whats the definitive behavior for
> a
> browser when it encounters a URL like:
>
> http://somehost/somedoc?item
>
> and is clickable (i.e ismap). When someone enter's clicks should the resulting
> URL be:
>
> http://somehost/somedoc?item?x,y (as mosaic for X handles it)
>
> or
>
> http://somehost/somedoc?x,y
>
> as in the case of the Mosaic for Mac's?
I've had problems with this too, except the other way. I'd like to be
able to have the document returned from a search, also searchable,
using the same search as the original document.
I like the way forms are submitted. Would it be possible to set
the head of the URL returned as the search as part of the <ISINDEX>,
like maybe <ISINDEX ACTION="http://...."> like the forms.
Does that make sense?
rik.
--
Rik Harris - rik.harris@vifp.monash.edu.au || Systems Programmer
+61 3 560-3265 (AH) +61 3 565-3227 (BH) || and Administrator
Fac. of Computing & Info.Tech., Monash Uni, Australia || Vic. Institute of
http://www.vifp.monash.edu.au/people/rik.html || Forensic Pathology